James Borkowski

Please join us in contacting the leadership at the Vancouver Diocese and demand that they investigate this serious injustice

http://rcav.org/contact-chancery/

There is definitely an appearance of Cronyism, when it comes to James Borkowski who has been hired as a “Delegate” for the Diocese.

James Borkowski is a Catholic After Hours supporter.  Catholic After Hours is a social club in Vancouver who is lead by a hostile feminist. She has threaten a good citizen who lived at Salvation Army with police and charges if he attends her “catholic group”.  When this happened the poor man lived on the downtown eastside and was poor.  The poor man cannot afford a lawyer to defend himself.

James Borkowski who is a “Delegate” for the Vancouver Diocese was made aware of this injustice where a poor conservative man was threatened by Ms. Chong.  James Borkowski did admit that he has known Ms. Chong for over 2 years and also admitted knowing Pavel Reid for several years.

But then James Borkowski attempted a scheme to protect Ms. Chong from any wrong doing. To add insult to injury, he attempted a scheme to convince the poor man to sign a document and agree to the false accusations. This of course strikes at the heart of justice and would be a miscarriage of justice.  James Borkowski  tried to convince the poor man to “sign a document” so James can manipulate him to appear that the poor man is at fault.

Another scheme James Borkowski attempted was convince the poor man that CAH is a private club. However, again when he was confronted with the evidence tried to change the subject.

James Borkowski  should not be permitted to be a “Delegate” for the Vancouver Diocese when he stands behind a hostile accuser who borders on committing crimes such as filing a false police report and fabrication of evidence.

What is even more appalling is that James Borkowski admits being a supporter a movement called “New Wave Feminism”. They are different in a sense that they are “pro life” , however simultaneously, share some of the characteristics of the feminism we all know, which is hostile to men.  How can Mr. James support this movement when on their own facebook page consider this picture as “BRILLIANT”

NEWWAVEFEMIMISM

James Borkowski should apologize to the Catholic community for supporting this movement and apologize to the poor man for his scheme which caused the poor-man severe distress and a crisis.

Did you want more proof that James Borkowski must not be a delegate and must apologize for his conduct?

Some of you might not be aware James Borkowski has been the Executive Director of an organization called Signal HIll.  This Signal Hill states that their “PURPOSE” is

We strengthen society by inspiring young people to cherish and protect life.

However please have a look at a recent tweet from Signal Hill

signalhill

 

Did you notice that the females at Signal Hill lead by James Borkowski are concerned about how “female superheroes” are being treated.

 Thus, we can see that James Borkowski shares and support the concerns regarding how female superheroes are being treated and the “new wave feminism” movement.  He should not be a delegate for the Catholic Church.

However James Borkowski attempted to conceal the fact that he considers Ms. Chong a female superhero when he attempted to have a good citizen sign a letter hoping the poor man will agree that the “female superhero” is not at fault.

James Borkowski not only disgraced the Catholic Faith which values charity and forgiveness but even disgraced the fundamental rules of justice which demands due process, the presumption of innocence, (or at very least a meeting with the accused).

To keep it brief: James Borkowski jumped from an accusation to “please sign here,that you are guilty”

If James Borkowski supports the false accussations then he should consider the possibility of being arrested and charged and convicted for the following crimes

Parties to offence
  •  (1) Every one is a party to an offence who

    • (a) actually commits it;

    • (b) does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or

    • (c) abets any person in committing it.

  • Marginal note: Common intention

    (2) Where two or more persons form an intention in common to carry out an unlawful purpose and to assist each other therein and any one of them, in carrying out the common purpose, commits an offence, each of them who knew or ought to have known that the commission of the offence would be a probable consequence of carrying out the common purpose is a party to that offence.

  • R.S., c. C-34, s. 21.
Marginal note: Person counselling offence
  •  (1) Where a person counsels another person to be a party to an offence and that other person is afterwards a party to that offence, the person who counselled is a party to that offence, notwithstanding that the offence was committed in a way different from that which was counselled.

  • (2) Every one who counsels another person to be a party to an offence is a party to every offence that the other commits in consequence of the counselling that the person who counselled knew or ought to have known was likely to be committed in consequence of the counselling.

  • Definition of “counsel”

    (3) For the purposes of this Act, “counsel” includes procure, solicit or incite.

Please join us in contacting the leadership at the Vancouver Diocese and demand that they investigate this serious injustice http://rcav.org/contact-chancery/ There is definitely an appearance of Cronyism, when it comes to James Borkowski who is a “Delegate” for the Diocese.

jamesborkowski

26 Woe to you when all speak well of you,
    for their ancestors treated the false prophets in this way.

Love of Enemies.[i] 27 “But to you who hear I say, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28 bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29 To the person who strikes you on one cheek, offer the other one as well, and from the person who takes your cloak, do not withhold even your tunic.30 Give to everyone who asks of you, and from the one who takes what is yours do not demand it back. 31 Do to others as you would have them do to you. 32 For if you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. 33 And if you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do the same. 34 If you lend money to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit [is] that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, and get back the same amount. 35 But rather, love your enemies and do good to them, and lend expecting nothing back; then your reward will be great and you will be children of the Most High, for he himself is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked.36 Be merciful, just as [also] your Father is merciful.

Judging Others.[j] 37 “Stop judging and you will not be judged. Stop condemning and you will not be condemned. Forgive and you will be forgiven.